Archive for Socialism

Free Speech on its Death Bed in Europe

Posted in Cultural Marxism, ONLINE DEBATE with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 24, 2017 by drjgelb

Professor Paul Cliteur had some interesting things to say during the recent Geert Wilders trial in which he gave excellent rational evidence supporting Mr Wilders right to ask his supporters at a meeting in an Hague bar whether they desired more or less (fewer) Moroccans to immigrate to The Netherlands. Sadly, the Dutch judges, blinded by ideology, decided to officially turn Moroccans into a ‘race’ in order to convict & sentence Geert Wilders for “hate speech” anyway.

The You Tuber who posted this video named “political correctness” as the Judges’ new “religion”. I think he nearly got it right but the truth is actually far more sinister.

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS is not the religion in question but is one of that religion’s weapons. That religion is Marxism. “Progressives” are more than “unconscious” of being pawns in a tried & tested strategy of the Left, they are IGNORANT of the full historical background that underpins the symbiotic relationship between Marxism, Progressivism, & Social Justice Activism. The entire adult population of Europe would greatly benefit from carefully reading Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”, which is the left’s blueprint for action following the failure of Bolshevism to be taken up outside of the Soviet Union, mainly due to its heavy reliance on violence, murder & terror. With little stomach for walking in Lenin & Stalin’s bloody footprints, international Marxists, inspired & guided by Alinsky, began the long task of sowing division amongst disparate groups in society by labelling them as “oppressed” & then pitting these “oppressed minorities”, women, blacks, homosexuals, transgendered, Muslims, Latinos etc against the state and simultaneously against each other by exaggerating the disparities in government responsiveness to their grievances. Alinsky taught his followers to pretend to care about the minorities they spurred to rebel & protest and he would actually yell at any idealists in the class who appeared empathetic to the targeted minorities. So what did he yell? He told them that the purpose of their focus on minorities was to foment a climate that favoured Revolution & that Revolution must be the penultimate goal of everything they were doing. And finally, what is the ultimate prize that Marxists desperately seek? Total, unbridled POWER! Power to destroy democracy & freedom and to replace it with a Marxist system in which loyalty to the state was rewarded and merit/achievement counted for nothing, where the property of those who strived & succeeded would be confiscated by the state & redistributed to those who had not, where a new elite would rob the nation blind & line their pockets with gold, while the rest of the population simply learned to line up in endless queues to buy whatever was not in shortage. If you recognise Venezuela in this scenario, it is no surprise, as the Marxist experiment has falied multiple times in exactly the same way – just as predicted so many years ago by the famous economists of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute. Google “Cultural Marxism” & learn what Social Justice Warriors & their “handlers” are really on about!

Feminism 2017

Posted in ONLINE DEBATE, U.S. POLITICS with tags , , , , , , on March 13, 2017 by drjgelb

Many young female bloggers are waking up to the hidden, subversive agenda of third wave feminism and some are asking what it’s all about. I commented recently on a You Tube video posing this very question & asking why feminists today ignore the terrible oppression of women in Muslim majority nations.

“The reason that current leaders of feminist organisations ignore the oppression of Muslim women and are allying with Islamists, is due entirely to their commitment to the principles of Marxism, specifically “Cultural Marxism”. This insidious cancer replaced “Revolutionary Marxism”, the violent overthrow of democratic capitalist governments, a strategy that failed to attract most of humanity outside the Soviet Union, where we witnessed the slaughter of 25million of its citizens in the name of egalitarianism. Cultural Marxism aims to disrupt, divide & conquer the West by pitting disparate minorities it convinces are oppressed, against each other & the state. Cultural Marxism gladly allies with Islamists & welcomes Muslim migration as an accelerant of the overthrow of the West, all the while assuming that Marxism will defeat Jihad in turn. It is a fool’s paradise they aspire to and one that threatens to plunge us all into another Dark Age.”

Enough Said!

Trump Derangement Syndrome reaches Australia!

Posted in U.S. POLITICS with tags , , , , , , , on February 28, 2017 by drjgelb

c5okdjawqaelwg7Greens Senator Scott Ludlum published the following article on his Medium blog today, titled “Fascism in larval form: Australia and the US in the age of Trump.” I encourage you to read the entire article but you will not be surprised to find that it is a Leftist diatribe by a dedicated parliamentary representative of Australia’s most Left-wing political party holding any electoral seats in the country and is firmly in the  Socialist camp. Here is the article link:

Read on Medium:

I could not resist commenting on this phenomenon of the spread of TDS to Down Under!

MY COMMENT:

“The gnashing of teeth re Donald Trump is enormously disingenuous & pundits must really believe that the informed public have no memory & are morons. We have just emerged from 8yrs of a dismal Presidency under Obama wherein allies were abandoned & enemies feted. 

Where were Progressive voices when Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in the face of its published Jihadist manifesto and its history of having spawned enemies like al Qaeda, Boko Haram, ISIS & dozens of other radical Islamic terrorist organisations? Where were Progressive voices when Obama participated in destroying Libya, when the State Department illegally supplied arms to the very Syrian rebels who became ISIS & its affiliates, when Obama directed the IRS to discriminate & hound conservative taxpayers, when the Obama Admin lied barefaced to the public re Benghazi & that notorious but irrelevant video, when Hillary Clinton revealed herself to be a pathological liar re her private email server & the destruction of State owned documents by the tens of thousands, when Obama betrayed the only democracy in the Middle East in favour of the duplicitous Palestinians whose desire to possess all of Israel & annihilate the Jews is plainly printed in the charters of Hamas & Fatah, when Obama lied to a National audience on the occasion of his first official visit to a Mosque in 2016, saying that Islam comes from the Arabic word for peace when he knows as a student in an Islamic school in Indonesia until age 14yrs that Islam comes from the Arabic word for submission, not peace, or when Obama swore in Congressman Keith Ellison on Jefferson’s famous Qur’an saying that Jefferson greatly admired Islam when reality is that Jefferson bought his Qur’an on his return from meeting with the Pasha of Tripoli in London where he and John Adams were witness to the Pasha reading from the sacred Islamic text that all Muslims were mandated to convert, kill or enslave non-believers. 

Jefferson obtained the Qur’an to determine the nature of an enemy that in 1798 was extorting 10% of the new American Nation’s GDP in return for repatriating pirated and abducted American crews. As a result of what he learned, Jefferson declared war on Tripoli & the Barbary Pirates and sent the fledgling U.S. Navy on its first overseas military mission where it waged a 5yr war, ending in a treaty. 

And where were the Progressive voices when the Clinton Foundation raked in 3 billion dollars in a massive pay to play scam and the Clintons were charging obscene speaking fees & funneling the money to Hillary’s war-purse? 

I could fill a book with scandals & disgraceful conduct of the Obama Administration that cannot possibly be matched in the first 40days of Trump! Currently, Trump has commenced implementation of the greatest number of campaign promises of any former President and has selected a serious, credentialed cabinet picked for their experience, success in achieving their goals and toughness. 

I have no doubt that the Left despise Trump & his team, as they must, because the agenda of the Left, having failed to win hearts & minds by either force or any record of successful governance, must continue to focus on division, identity politics, discord, racialism & interminable virtue signalling from the massive cohort of brainwashed graduates of left dominated faculties in Universities throughout the Union who call themselves Social Justice Warriors and everyone else, racists, bigots, Islamophobes, homophobes and most stupid of all, NAZIS! (who were of course socialists, not fascists……it’s in their name liberals!). Until you balance your anti-Trump bias with an honest critique of his rivals, your efforts will be seen as self-serving and merely leftist propaganda.”

View story at Medium.com

View story at Medium.com

HILLARY CLINTON’S GLOBALIST AGENDA WILL DESTROY AMERICA!

Posted in U.S. POLITICS with tags , , , , , , , , , on October 22, 2016 by drjgelb

U.N. goes all-in for unlimited migration!

Hillary an enthusiastic supporter of globalist plan for U.S. cities

The United Nations has cooked up a “New Urban Agenda” coming soon to a city near you.

It was unveiled this week in Quito, Ecuador, at the so-called Habitat III conference.

And part of the plan, enthusiastically embraced by Hillary Clinton, calls for unlimited migration across open borders. Migrants displaced by war, failing economies or other hardships will be seen as having “rights” in nations other than their own. Cities are seen as the key battlegrounds and the U.N. conference in Quito had a lot to say about how your city will be expected to embrace migrants of all types, from all regions of the world.

By now most Americans who follow world events are familiar with the U.N’s plan for global governance as envisioned by its “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” approved by some 190 world leaders including President Obama and Pope Francis in September 2015.

This agenda includes 17 goals aimed at ending hunger, wiping out poverty and stamping out global income inequality by “transforming our world” through sweeping changes ostensibly aimed at freeing cross-border “labor mobility,” among other things.

Hillary Clinton, anointed by Obama as his successor, said in a speech to Wall Street bankers she envisions the U.S. as part of a single “hemispheric common market with free trade and open borders,” according to WikiLeaks data dumps.

In another bombshell revealed by WikiLeaks, Mrs. Clinton told Goldman Sachs bankers that Americans who want to limit immigration are “fundamentally un-American.” She has also called for a 550-percent increase in the resettlement of Syrian refugees in America – that’s 550 percent more than Obama’s vastly increased level of more than 12,000 resettled in one year.

In short, Hillary’s agenda for cities sounds an awful lot like the U.N.’s agenda for cities as laid out in the New Urban Agenda document approved this week by world leaders in Quito.

“She’s totally in line with the U.N. agenda, on board with everything they do,” says economist Patrick Wood, author of “Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation.”

Clinton earlier this year announced her $135 billion “breaking every barrier” program to transform America’s cities.

In this plan, she makes 37 pledges promising everything from removal of blight to construction of affordable housing in areas that are currently out of the price range of refugees, immigrants, the chronically unemployed and under-employed. She intends to build on the “successes” of her husband and the Obama administration in using public-private partnerships to transform cities. Obama’s contribution in this area included his Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule, which forces grant-receiving cities to infuse their low-crime suburban areas, deemed “too white,” with subsidized housing marketed to low-income renters.

This fits right in with the U.N.’s 2030 Agenda.

Wood, an expert on global governance and the technocracy movement, said “She’s making a pre announcement here that she’s going to follow the U.N. agenda. She’s signaling to her fellow globalists that she’s 100 percent on board with their agenda.”

The problem that keeps globalists like Obama and Clinton up at night is how to implement the sweeping changes laid out in the U.N. 2030 Agenda last September at the global sustainability summit in New York.

That’s where Habitat III comes into play. It’s called the U.N. Conference on Housing and Sustainable Development or “Habitat III” for short. Its focus is on the world’s cities.

Largest U.N. conference ever:

Habitat III was attended by a staggering 50,000 people including more than 200 mayors and another 140 city delegations. 

The sole purpose of this conference, held only once every 20 years by the U.N., is to approve a 24-page document called the New Urban Agenda.

“The only purpose of the conference is to rubber stamp this document and elevate it and lift it up to the world,” said Wood. “And right now it looks like they are. Everybody. All the nations.”

In this document lies the globalists’ plans for cities. All cities. Big, small, even tiny cities. Every American who lives in a city will at some point see the fruits of the plan the U.N. has in store for the world, says Wood, an expert on global governance and the technocracy movement.

The Habitat conference convenes only once every 20 years but when it does, it leaves a trail of anti-capitalist, anti-freedom “global standards” in its wake, says Wood. These are the standards by which the U.N. wants each and every city in the world to be operated. They come packaged as “non-binding” and Congress never approves them.

Yet, somehow, the global standards coming out of the major U.N. conferences always seem to filter down to even the smallest American hamlet. How? Through federal grants. Any city that accepts federal grants will at some point be required to implement the practices that the U.N. has declared “sustainable.”

‘Inclusive’ by design, coercive by default:

The catch word in the New Urban Agenda is “inclusive” or “inclusivity.” This concept has a long history with globalists.

The definition of “technocracy” as used by the original technocrats back 1938 was “the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism, to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.” That’s according to The Technocrat magazine.

“They use the word ‘entire’ twice in that definition so I’m really not surprised we see it showing up in these conferences today,” Wood said. “Their intent is to create a net that will catch 100 percent of the people.”

The word “inclusive” or “inclusivity” appear in the New Urban Agenda document no fewer than 36 times.

“There is no exclusion,” Wood says. “If you read the New Urban Agenda document, you’ll find for instance under item 6a, ‘transformative commitments,’ the statement starts out ‘leave no one behind.’”

That same phrase, leave no one behind, is in the U.N.’s 2030 Agenda.

“In fact just about everywhere you go now at the U.N. you’ll find this concept,” Wood said. “It’s a little disturbing.”

Wood says the U.N. is resurrecting an old concept that fizzled in the early days of the technocracy movement, back in the 1930s. Its time hadn’t arrived yet, but now things are different. The world is run by big data and the world is eager to embraced a set of globalized, one-world standards for everything, whether it be Common Core education standards, globalized police standards that Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the U.N. last fall in the form of the Strong Cities Network, or global standards for healthcare, ala Obamacare. You name it, the United Nations wants to standardize it.

The next big hurdle in the race to standardize the world is the issue of immigration:

Point 42 on page 7 of the New Urban Agenda talks about cities providing opportunities for dialogue, “paying particular attention to the potential contributions” of women and children, the elderly and disabled, “refugees and internally displaced persons and migrants, regardless of migration status, and without discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity, or socio-economic status.”

Everyone is welcome:

Wood notes that, in America, that would mean exactly what John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign manager, has already said — that anyone with a driver’s license should be allowed to vote.

“This is the way I read it,” he said. “It doesn’t matter if they’re legal or illegal, wanted or unwanted, jihadists or non-jihadists, sick or healthy. If they show up in your country, they must participate in the affairs of that country immediately, whatever country they find themselves in.”

The preamble to the New Urban Agenda says cities are the “key to tackling global challenges.”

“So these people are viewing cities as the key ingredient right now to implementing sustainable development, and they say this battle for sustainability will be won or lost in the cities.”

And the U.N. document goes on to state that this agenda is “the first step for operationalizing sustainable development in an integrated and coordinated way at the global, national, subnational, and local levels.”

In essence, it’s a roadmap to global governance where American cities will no longer get their direction from elected officials representing them on the city council, or even the state legislature, but the United Nations itself. The local councils will likely not even know that the rules they are following in order to qualify for federal grants are tied to United Nations’ standards for sustainability.

Cities committing to ‘a paradigm shift’:

The document talks about cities committing to “a paradigm shift” in the way they “plan, develop and manage urban development.”

“It’s top to bottom,” Wood said. “They’re saying it’s going to be a top-down implementation. But for all the gains that sustainable development have made since 1992, there’s been a complaint that it hasn’t gone fast enough or far enough, and that it’s not inclusive enough, that some pockets have been left out. So, what they’re saying here is that this New Urban Agenda document is really, in their minds, the first step for operationalizing it. First step to making sustainable development completely operational. That’s huge.”

Wallace Henley, a journalist and former aide in the Nixon White House who went on to become a Christian pastor and who has written extensively on globalism, said the U.N. is making a full-on assault against the American system of government, which requires federalism, states’ rights and separation of powers.

“The U.N. is a glaring example of the inevitable course of bureaucracies. Like kudzu in Alabama, a tiny seed will inevitably spread until it controls the whole of a hillside,” Henley told WND in an email.

And he, like Wood, sees Hillary Clinton in the thick of the battle, fighting on the side of the globalists, not America first.

“The leftist-progressive philosophy is the fertilizer. Agencies sprout and grow, and bring forth policy confabs like Habitat III. The conferences then produce white papers that ultimately become the source of policies,” he said. “It is a leftist-progressivist dream.”

“Sustainability” is a code word for regulatory authority, Henley said, and that is the suffocating vine that chokes out everything else.

“This meshes perfectly with the New Globalism and its dream of a world without borders. Anything can be done in the name of a ‘sustainable’ future, including the ‘humanitarian invasion’ of a sovereign state – but only if its leaders embrace the same left-progressive philosophy as the bureaucracies headquartered in New York. This makes a Hillary Clinton presidency even more foreboding,” he said.

And these “progressives” include many in the Republican Party who are now shilling for Clinton, such as House Speaker Paul Ryan and Arizona Sen. John McCain.

“The true conservative seeks preservation of liberty-nurturing principles, and the sustenance of values that resist the control of the bureaucrats and guarantee freedom from a globalist hegemon in the form of the U.N.,” Henley said

Eric Voegelin’s 1975 book, “From Enlightenment to Revolution,” describes with amazing prescience the “line of progress” according to the revolutionaries who drive what Henley calls the New Globalism, from the local to the global, from the individual to the mass of humanity, from nation-states to a concentrated global power.

“This is the big picture of which Habitat III and its New Urban Agenda is a part.”

IN MY OPINION, HERE IS THE BLUEPRINT FOR THE DISMANTLING OF AMERICA AND ITS FREEDOMS – Jerome Gelb – Psychiatrist

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism is Totalitarian By George Reisman

Posted in ONLINE DEBATE with tags , , , , on April 12, 2016 by drjgelb

I came across George Reisman’s 2005 lecture at the Mises Institute Supporters’ Summit and learned a great deal from it. I share it here with full credit to Mr Reisman. I recommend to all the wonderful resources of the Mises Institute, an economist’s mecca!

 

 

I hope my readers find this video illuminating!

%d bloggers like this: