Archive for politics

Trump Derangement Syndrome reaches Australia!

Posted in U.S. POLITICS with tags , , , , , , , on February 28, 2017 by drjgelb

c5okdjawqaelwg7Greens Senator Scott Ludlum published the following article on his Medium blog today, titled “Fascism in larval form: Australia and the US in the age of Trump.” I encourage you to read the entire article but you will not be surprised to find that it is a Leftist diatribe by a dedicated parliamentary representative of Australia’s most Left-wing political party holding any electoral seats in the country and is firmly in the  Socialist camp. Here is the article link:

Read on Medium:

I could not resist commenting on this phenomenon of the spread of TDS to Down Under!

MY COMMENT:

“The gnashing of teeth re Donald Trump is enormously disingenuous & pundits must really believe that the informed public have no memory & are morons. We have just emerged from 8yrs of a dismal Presidency under Obama wherein allies were abandoned & enemies feted. 

Where were Progressive voices when Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in the face of its published Jihadist manifesto and its history of having spawned enemies like al Qaeda, Boko Haram, ISIS & dozens of other radical Islamic terrorist organisations? Where were Progressive voices when Obama participated in destroying Libya, when the State Department illegally supplied arms to the very Syrian rebels who became ISIS & its affiliates, when Obama directed the IRS to discriminate & hound conservative taxpayers, when the Obama Admin lied barefaced to the public re Benghazi & that notorious but irrelevant video, when Hillary Clinton revealed herself to be a pathological liar re her private email server & the destruction of State owned documents by the tens of thousands, when Obama betrayed the only democracy in the Middle East in favour of the duplicitous Palestinians whose desire to possess all of Israel & annihilate the Jews is plainly printed in the charters of Hamas & Fatah, when Obama lied to a National audience on the occasion of his first official visit to a Mosque in 2016, saying that Islam comes from the Arabic word for peace when he knows as a student in an Islamic school in Indonesia until age 14yrs that Islam comes from the Arabic word for submission, not peace, or when Obama swore in Congressman Keith Ellison on Jefferson’s famous Qur’an saying that Jefferson greatly admired Islam when reality is that Jefferson bought his Qur’an on his return from meeting with the Pasha of Tripoli in London where he and John Adams were witness to the Pasha reading from the sacred Islamic text that all Muslims were mandated to convert, kill or enslave non-believers. 

Jefferson obtained the Qur’an to determine the nature of an enemy that in 1798 was extorting 10% of the new American Nation’s GDP in return for repatriating pirated and abducted American crews. As a result of what he learned, Jefferson declared war on Tripoli & the Barbary Pirates and sent the fledgling U.S. Navy on its first overseas military mission where it waged a 5yr war, ending in a treaty. 

And where were the Progressive voices when the Clinton Foundation raked in 3 billion dollars in a massive pay to play scam and the Clintons were charging obscene speaking fees & funneling the money to Hillary’s war-purse? 

I could fill a book with scandals & disgraceful conduct of the Obama Administration that cannot possibly be matched in the first 40days of Trump! Currently, Trump has commenced implementation of the greatest number of campaign promises of any former President and has selected a serious, credentialed cabinet picked for their experience, success in achieving their goals and toughness. 

I have no doubt that the Left despise Trump & his team, as they must, because the agenda of the Left, having failed to win hearts & minds by either force or any record of successful governance, must continue to focus on division, identity politics, discord, racialism & interminable virtue signalling from the massive cohort of brainwashed graduates of left dominated faculties in Universities throughout the Union who call themselves Social Justice Warriors and everyone else, racists, bigots, Islamophobes, homophobes and most stupid of all, NAZIS! (who were of course socialists, not fascists……it’s in their name liberals!). Until you balance your anti-Trump bias with an honest critique of his rivals, your efforts will be seen as self-serving and merely leftist propaganda.”

View story at Medium.com

View story at Medium.com

RECKLESS AND INDEFENSIBLE

Posted in ONLINE DEBATE, U.S. POLITICS with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 3, 2017 by drjgelb

Betrayal Backlash: Obama, Kerry Slammed and Schooled on Israel By Top Senate Democrat – by Guy Benson

30th December 2016

It’s not just conservatives who are furious with the Obama administration’s shameful betrayal of Israel at the United Nations shortly before Christmas — a number of leading Democrats are criticizing the move, which lawmakers on both sides of the aisle say further undermines both Israel’s security, as well as America’s bipartisan pro-Israel consensus. In his long-winded and unproductive speech this week, outgoing Secretary of State John Kerry spent an inordinate amount of time fixating on the issue of Israeli settlements, going out of his way to lambaste the “right-wing” government that Israeli voters have elected:

“The Israeli prime minister publicly supports a two-state solution, but his current coalition is the most right wing in Israeli history, with an agenda driven by the most extreme elements,” Kerry said. “The result is that policies of this government, which the prime minister himself just described as more committed to settlements than any in Israel’s history, are leading in the opposite direction. They’re leading towards one state.” Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Kerry pointedly noted, opposes a two-state solution, as do other members of the governing coalition.

Many Israelis see the two-state solution as an unrealistic pipe dream so long as Palestinians doggedly refuse to even recognize Israel as a Jewish state at all, with less than a quarter of Palestinians polled in favor of an outcome in which Israel has the right to exist as a Jewish nation.  Indeed, Kerry had barely finished speaking when a Palestinian official reiterated his side’s opposition to Israel’s existence, saying that the Secretary of State’s words changed nothing.  Those stark realities notwithstanding, Kerry invoked the word “settlements” more than 40 times during his address, while mentioning “Hamas” just four times. A few thoughts:

(1) It’s difficult to overstate the backwardness of a worldview that obsesses over Israel’s settlements — including housing developments within the Jewish Quarter of its own capital city — while paying relatively scant attention to the Palestinians’ anti-peace extremism. They will not recognize Israel as a legitimate Jewish state. They will not foreswear violence. They will not stop teaching their children to hate Israel and glorify the killing of Jews. They will not stop calling for the destruction of the state of Israel. These are the true, intransigent, violent barriers to peace, not Israeli settlements. These truths should be very obvious — and they have been to US policymakers for decades. That’s why the United States has always held the United Nations’ virulently anti-Israel jackals at bay in Security Council proceedings. Until this administration’s disgraceful abstention and alleged whipping of anti-Israel votes among other members last week, that is.

(2) Perhaps voters in Israel elected a harder-line government (in spite of, or perhaps because of, accusations of Obama administration meddling against Benjamin Netanyahu, whom Obama reportedly loathes) due to a prevailing suspicion that the Obama White House does not have Israel’s back. Obama has a long history of pandering to Israel’s adversaries, then brokered a disastrous nuclear deal with Iran, which Israel’s leaders understandably view as an existential threat to their people. Is it any wonder that faced with these global headwinds and historically-hostile American posture, Israeli voters would err on the side of electing a muscular government that prioritizes the safety and security of its citizens? The Obama administration has actively helped to isolate Israel on the world stage, and Israelis doesn’t trust American leadership right now. Kerry’s bemoaning of their electoral decisions is therefore ironic; Obama’s actions empowered the so-called “hardliners.”

(3) Crucially, there is a very relevant (and fairly recent) history lesson here that is evidently lost on Obama and Kerry’s “Smart Power” set.  It lays bear the foolishness and myopia of the ‘settlements’ tunnel vision. We’ve seen this movie before, and some of us remember how it played out — including incoming Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer. It’s astonishing that this even needs to be said, but it does:

Israel’s government unilaterally uprooted all settlements in Gaza back in 2005, forcibly removing thousands of its citizens from their homes in pursuit of peace. After the Israelis fully withdrew, the Palestinians in Gaza burned all Israeli remnants (including valuable resources) to the ground, then elected Hamas terrorists as their “government,” which has fired thousands of rockets at Israeli civilians and constructed terror tunnels.
Settlements are not blocking peace. The Palestinians are, because their leadership in Gaza and the West Bank — who have joined together on a number of occaions to form pro-terror unity governments — do not want peace.  Which is why the Obama administration’s decision to make Israel’s life even harder by validating Palestinian narratives among the international community is so reckless and indefensible.

TRUMP DELIBERATELY MISQUOTED BY DEMOCRATS!

Posted in U.S. POLITICS with tags , , , , , , on December 19, 2016 by drjgelb

It’s a Myth that Trump Called for the Russians to Hack anyone! It all Started with Katy Tur!

Obama repeats media creation that president-elect called on foreign government to hack Clinton!

It has become an unshakable article of faith on the Left that President-Elect Donald Trump asked Russia to hack computer systems in order to defeat his Democrat opponent Hillary Clinton. Of course Russia hacks, the People’s Republic of China hacks, North Korea hacks, and every country that gathers intelligence hacks, with varying degrees of efficiency.

At what was billed as President Obama’s final press conference Friday, the outgoing president said he was confirming Russia tried to interfere in the Nov. 8 election.

“This happened at the highest levels of the Russian government,” Obama said. But there has never been any evidence that Trump called upon Russia to hack anybody. It simply never happened. And this is not an arguable point. It is not a close call. Yet eyewitnesses say they saw and heard something that didn’t actually take place.

“I personally saw President-Elect Trump say, go ahead and hack Hillary Clinton,” liberal pundit Juan Williams said Thursday on “The Five” on Fox News Channel. Williams seemed to be referring to a July 27 press conference in Doral, Florida, at which the mainstream media hallucinated then-Republican candidate Trump was inviting Russian President Vladimir Putin to use cyberterrorism to help him win the White House.

On Wednesday, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said in a matter-of-fact tone that Trump asked Russia to use cyber warfare against Clinton. “There’s ample evidence that was known long before the election and in most cases long before October about the Trump campaign and Russia — everything from the Republican nominee himself calling on Russia to hack his opponent,” Earnest said. “It might be an indication that he was obviously aware and concluded, based on whatever facts or sources he had available to him, that Russia was involved and their involvement was having a negative impact on his opponent’s campaign.” “That’s why he was encouraging them to keep doing it,” Earnest said.

Where did these people come up with a dangerous, provable falsehood that is undermining both the American electoral system and the incoming administration?

Take a look at the video footage of Trump’s July 27 press conference!

At the press conference, Trump, half-jokingly, urged the Russians to hand over those supposedly personal emails from Hillary’s accounts that had disappeared into the ether. “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Trump said.

He added sarcastically: “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Remember that Clinton admitted to grabbing some 66,000 emails and then returning about half of them which she claimed didn’t touch upon personal matters. She said those personal emails were deleted.

A few minutes later in the press conference, NBC reporter Katy Tur shouted a loaded question at Trump to introduce into the mainstream media ecosystem the Big Lie that Trump had personally invited Russia to interfere in U.S. elections.

“Do you have any qualms about asking a foreign government — Russia, China, anybody — to interfere, to hack into the system of anybody in this country?”

Trump was understandably dismissive of Tur’s question without specifically denying the premise underlying it — which was the false assertion that Trump asked a foreign government to engage in hacking. Tur restated her question replacing the word “qualms” with “pause.”

“Hey, you know what gives me more pause, that a person in our government, crooked Hillary Clinton — here’s what gives me more pause,” Trump said.

He continued:

“Be quiet, I know you want to, you know, save her. That a person in our government, Katy, would delete or get rid of 33,000 emails. That gives me a big problem. After she gets a subpoena. She gets subpoenaed, and she gets rid of 33,000 emails. That gives me a problem. Now, if Russia or China or any other country has those emails, I mean to be honest with you, I’d love to see them.” Trump reinforced his point on Twitter a few minutes later. He tweeted: “If Russia or any other country or person has Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 illegally deleted e-mails, perhaps they should share them with the FBI!”

In the meantime, The New York Times wrote on July 27: “Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he hoped Russian intelligence services had successfully hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, and encouraged them to publish whatever they may have stolen, essentially urging a foreign adversary to conduct cyberespionage against a former secretary of state.”

The New York Times and CNN then vigorously promoted the lie. And so Katy Tur’s strategically placed Big Lie was carved into the Left’s narrative and repeated so many times that the mainstream media now treats it as indisputably true. It is now regurgitated almost continuously by journalists, editorial writers, Democrats, Republicans, left-wingers, and even some conservatives who don’t know any better.

So-called liberals and progressives use the power of narrative — of telling a story — in order to alter the public’s perception of reality. They take real facts and then they distort them or put a plausible spin on them until the truth is massaged to serve their interests.

In other words, they lie. Yet not everyone who swears up and down that Trump asked Vladimir Putin to interfere in the recent U.S. elections is lying.

Lying requires dishonest intentions. A sincerely held belief cannot be a lie.

But it’s important to remember that this ugly lie began with one person and her name is Katy Tur.

Matthew Vadum is senior vice president at Capital Research Center, an investigative think tank in Washington, D.C.

DANIEL GREENFIELD’S TWO MOST RECENT POSTS ARE BRILLIANT!

Posted in MIDDLE-EAST POLITICS, U.S. POLITICS with tags , , , , , , , , , , on November 17, 2016 by drjgelb

 

A “MUST READ” experience awaits you:

 

 

U.S. Election: Cry Babies & Safety Pins!

Posted in U.S. POLITICS with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on November 14, 2016 by drjgelb

 

Chris Scott of SafetyPinDecal.com posted in Product Hunt 3 days ago.
This is what was posted & below is my annoyed response. How apt is the Safety-Pin symbol for these cry-babies!? Compulsory National Service works in Switzerland. Every household is a component in that nation’s philosophy of “armed neutrality” and so called “Millenials” are both responsible & resilient. 

“Brexit brought with it a 41% spike in hate crimes, causing many immigrants to live in fear of intimidation and violence. Out of this fear grew a community of people willing to stand up for those who feel threatened, to stand with and defend the marginalized.

The Safety Pin is the symbol of this movement, showing those around you that you believe in hope over hate.

Since the presidential election in the United States, we’re already seeing this same trend here in the US, with increasing hate speech, violence and intimidation toward minorities.

Put this decal on your car, laptop, water bottle or in the window of your home to show those around you that you will stand up for and welcome the marginalized and the downtrodden.

Let them know they’re safe with you and that you believe in #HopeNotHate.

All profits are donated to charity. See website for specifics.”

JEROME GELB — Psychiatrist
In 2012 (available without FBI login), FBI figures showed that 62.4% of hate crimes by religion, were against Jews & 11.6% against Muslims. (https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2…). No “safety-pin” campaign has ever been applied towards protecting Jews in America.
The narrative of widespread Muslim “backlash” is propaganda spread by CAIR & the Regressive Left.
Jew-Hatred is a core principle of the trilogy of source Islamic Sacred Texts, a fact totally ignored by Mainstream Media.
Theological Illiteracy in the U.S. is at record levels and is especially high in respect of Islam. Study of Islam will reveal that Islam’s “Judgement Day” & ascendence of faithful adherents to Paradise, cannot occur as long as a single Jew remains alive on this planet and the Qur’an calls upon believers in Allah & His Messenger, Muhammad, to find every last Jew, including any hiding behind trees or under rocks & kill them.
Reaction to this well-known aspect of Islam by SJW’s and Regressives, is SILENCE or denial. No consideration whatsoever is given to the fear that unvetted Muslim immigration causes in many communities previously & currently targeted/victimised by the militant forces of Islam.
The “down-trodden” you speak of are the very people that the Democrats have used and neglected for 2 centuries. Anyone with even a passing interest in U.S. history will tell you that the Democrats were the party of Native American genocide & land confiscation, African American Slavery, Civil War antagonists, the party of lynchings, the KKK, Segregation and Jim Crow Laws and that they opposed the granting of suffrage to women and blacks.
The Democrats established inner city black ghettos & have been responsible for their decay as the party overwhelmingly administering American cities. The Democrats were also involved in collusion with the Mafia, Political, Union & Voter Corruption & Fraud via Tammany Hall, Boss Tweed & his ilk and in the 1960’s, the Democrats lied about the so called “great switch”, in which only 1% of Democrats became Republicans & vice versa. The Democratic Party has remained the party of racists and corruption.
Bill & Hillary Clinton’s ingrained corruption of American Politics is appalling to informed and educated Australians like me who had no iron in the fire of this election, and how any American could want a President beholden to the Arab Theocracies who paid hundreds of millions of dollars to The Clinton Foundation and to the Clintons’ personal accounts, is incomprehensible.
To reject the result of the ultimate sign of Democracy, a free & fair general election, because your candidate failed to reveal her psychopathy sufficient for you to recognise it, is no reason to protest, to riot, to cry or to engage in empty, muddle-headed virtue signalling campaigns such as this.
Grow-up, accept the result, demand whatever degree of political accountability you wish over the next 4yrs and learn the detailed history of both major U.S. political parties, remembering that the two mentors Hillary Clinton expresses most regard for are former Democratic Senator & Grand Wizard of the KKK, Robert Byrd and Communist agitator, author and expert Community Organiser, Saul Alinsky (on whom Hillary wrote her thesis).
Put away the Safety Pins before someone really gets pricked!

HILLARY CLINTON’S GLOBALIST AGENDA WILL DESTROY AMERICA!

Posted in U.S. POLITICS with tags , , , , , , , , , on October 22, 2016 by drjgelb

U.N. goes all-in for unlimited migration!

Hillary an enthusiastic supporter of globalist plan for U.S. cities

The United Nations has cooked up a “New Urban Agenda” coming soon to a city near you.

It was unveiled this week in Quito, Ecuador, at the so-called Habitat III conference.

And part of the plan, enthusiastically embraced by Hillary Clinton, calls for unlimited migration across open borders. Migrants displaced by war, failing economies or other hardships will be seen as having “rights” in nations other than their own. Cities are seen as the key battlegrounds and the U.N. conference in Quito had a lot to say about how your city will be expected to embrace migrants of all types, from all regions of the world.

By now most Americans who follow world events are familiar with the U.N’s plan for global governance as envisioned by its “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” approved by some 190 world leaders including President Obama and Pope Francis in September 2015.

This agenda includes 17 goals aimed at ending hunger, wiping out poverty and stamping out global income inequality by “transforming our world” through sweeping changes ostensibly aimed at freeing cross-border “labor mobility,” among other things.

Hillary Clinton, anointed by Obama as his successor, said in a speech to Wall Street bankers she envisions the U.S. as part of a single “hemispheric common market with free trade and open borders,” according to WikiLeaks data dumps.

In another bombshell revealed by WikiLeaks, Mrs. Clinton told Goldman Sachs bankers that Americans who want to limit immigration are “fundamentally un-American.” She has also called for a 550-percent increase in the resettlement of Syrian refugees in America – that’s 550 percent more than Obama’s vastly increased level of more than 12,000 resettled in one year.

In short, Hillary’s agenda for cities sounds an awful lot like the U.N.’s agenda for cities as laid out in the New Urban Agenda document approved this week by world leaders in Quito.

“She’s totally in line with the U.N. agenda, on board with everything they do,” says economist Patrick Wood, author of “Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation.”

Clinton earlier this year announced her $135 billion “breaking every barrier” program to transform America’s cities.

In this plan, she makes 37 pledges promising everything from removal of blight to construction of affordable housing in areas that are currently out of the price range of refugees, immigrants, the chronically unemployed and under-employed. She intends to build on the “successes” of her husband and the Obama administration in using public-private partnerships to transform cities. Obama’s contribution in this area included his Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule, which forces grant-receiving cities to infuse their low-crime suburban areas, deemed “too white,” with subsidized housing marketed to low-income renters.

This fits right in with the U.N.’s 2030 Agenda.

Wood, an expert on global governance and the technocracy movement, said “She’s making a pre announcement here that she’s going to follow the U.N. agenda. She’s signaling to her fellow globalists that she’s 100 percent on board with their agenda.”

The problem that keeps globalists like Obama and Clinton up at night is how to implement the sweeping changes laid out in the U.N. 2030 Agenda last September at the global sustainability summit in New York.

That’s where Habitat III comes into play. It’s called the U.N. Conference on Housing and Sustainable Development or “Habitat III” for short. Its focus is on the world’s cities.

Largest U.N. conference ever:

Habitat III was attended by a staggering 50,000 people including more than 200 mayors and another 140 city delegations. 

The sole purpose of this conference, held only once every 20 years by the U.N., is to approve a 24-page document called the New Urban Agenda.

“The only purpose of the conference is to rubber stamp this document and elevate it and lift it up to the world,” said Wood. “And right now it looks like they are. Everybody. All the nations.”

In this document lies the globalists’ plans for cities. All cities. Big, small, even tiny cities. Every American who lives in a city will at some point see the fruits of the plan the U.N. has in store for the world, says Wood, an expert on global governance and the technocracy movement.

The Habitat conference convenes only once every 20 years but when it does, it leaves a trail of anti-capitalist, anti-freedom “global standards” in its wake, says Wood. These are the standards by which the U.N. wants each and every city in the world to be operated. They come packaged as “non-binding” and Congress never approves them.

Yet, somehow, the global standards coming out of the major U.N. conferences always seem to filter down to even the smallest American hamlet. How? Through federal grants. Any city that accepts federal grants will at some point be required to implement the practices that the U.N. has declared “sustainable.”

‘Inclusive’ by design, coercive by default:

The catch word in the New Urban Agenda is “inclusive” or “inclusivity.” This concept has a long history with globalists.

The definition of “technocracy” as used by the original technocrats back 1938 was “the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism, to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population.” That’s according to The Technocrat magazine.

“They use the word ‘entire’ twice in that definition so I’m really not surprised we see it showing up in these conferences today,” Wood said. “Their intent is to create a net that will catch 100 percent of the people.”

The word “inclusive” or “inclusivity” appear in the New Urban Agenda document no fewer than 36 times.

“There is no exclusion,” Wood says. “If you read the New Urban Agenda document, you’ll find for instance under item 6a, ‘transformative commitments,’ the statement starts out ‘leave no one behind.’”

That same phrase, leave no one behind, is in the U.N.’s 2030 Agenda.

“In fact just about everywhere you go now at the U.N. you’ll find this concept,” Wood said. “It’s a little disturbing.”

Wood says the U.N. is resurrecting an old concept that fizzled in the early days of the technocracy movement, back in the 1930s. Its time hadn’t arrived yet, but now things are different. The world is run by big data and the world is eager to embraced a set of globalized, one-world standards for everything, whether it be Common Core education standards, globalized police standards that Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced at the U.N. last fall in the form of the Strong Cities Network, or global standards for healthcare, ala Obamacare. You name it, the United Nations wants to standardize it.

The next big hurdle in the race to standardize the world is the issue of immigration:

Point 42 on page 7 of the New Urban Agenda talks about cities providing opportunities for dialogue, “paying particular attention to the potential contributions” of women and children, the elderly and disabled, “refugees and internally displaced persons and migrants, regardless of migration status, and without discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity, or socio-economic status.”

Everyone is welcome:

Wood notes that, in America, that would mean exactly what John Podesta, Clinton’s campaign manager, has already said — that anyone with a driver’s license should be allowed to vote.

“This is the way I read it,” he said. “It doesn’t matter if they’re legal or illegal, wanted or unwanted, jihadists or non-jihadists, sick or healthy. If they show up in your country, they must participate in the affairs of that country immediately, whatever country they find themselves in.”

The preamble to the New Urban Agenda says cities are the “key to tackling global challenges.”

“So these people are viewing cities as the key ingredient right now to implementing sustainable development, and they say this battle for sustainability will be won or lost in the cities.”

And the U.N. document goes on to state that this agenda is “the first step for operationalizing sustainable development in an integrated and coordinated way at the global, national, subnational, and local levels.”

In essence, it’s a roadmap to global governance where American cities will no longer get their direction from elected officials representing them on the city council, or even the state legislature, but the United Nations itself. The local councils will likely not even know that the rules they are following in order to qualify for federal grants are tied to United Nations’ standards for sustainability.

Cities committing to ‘a paradigm shift’:

The document talks about cities committing to “a paradigm shift” in the way they “plan, develop and manage urban development.”

“It’s top to bottom,” Wood said. “They’re saying it’s going to be a top-down implementation. But for all the gains that sustainable development have made since 1992, there’s been a complaint that it hasn’t gone fast enough or far enough, and that it’s not inclusive enough, that some pockets have been left out. So, what they’re saying here is that this New Urban Agenda document is really, in their minds, the first step for operationalizing it. First step to making sustainable development completely operational. That’s huge.”

Wallace Henley, a journalist and former aide in the Nixon White House who went on to become a Christian pastor and who has written extensively on globalism, said the U.N. is making a full-on assault against the American system of government, which requires federalism, states’ rights and separation of powers.

“The U.N. is a glaring example of the inevitable course of bureaucracies. Like kudzu in Alabama, a tiny seed will inevitably spread until it controls the whole of a hillside,” Henley told WND in an email.

And he, like Wood, sees Hillary Clinton in the thick of the battle, fighting on the side of the globalists, not America first.

“The leftist-progressive philosophy is the fertilizer. Agencies sprout and grow, and bring forth policy confabs like Habitat III. The conferences then produce white papers that ultimately become the source of policies,” he said. “It is a leftist-progressivist dream.”

“Sustainability” is a code word for regulatory authority, Henley said, and that is the suffocating vine that chokes out everything else.

“This meshes perfectly with the New Globalism and its dream of a world without borders. Anything can be done in the name of a ‘sustainable’ future, including the ‘humanitarian invasion’ of a sovereign state – but only if its leaders embrace the same left-progressive philosophy as the bureaucracies headquartered in New York. This makes a Hillary Clinton presidency even more foreboding,” he said.

And these “progressives” include many in the Republican Party who are now shilling for Clinton, such as House Speaker Paul Ryan and Arizona Sen. John McCain.

“The true conservative seeks preservation of liberty-nurturing principles, and the sustenance of values that resist the control of the bureaucrats and guarantee freedom from a globalist hegemon in the form of the U.N.,” Henley said

Eric Voegelin’s 1975 book, “From Enlightenment to Revolution,” describes with amazing prescience the “line of progress” according to the revolutionaries who drive what Henley calls the New Globalism, from the local to the global, from the individual to the mass of humanity, from nation-states to a concentrated global power.

“This is the big picture of which Habitat III and its New Urban Agenda is a part.”

IN MY OPINION, HERE IS THE BLUEPRINT FOR THE DISMANTLING OF AMERICA AND ITS FREEDOMS – Jerome Gelb – Psychiatrist

Bosch Fawstin:Cartoons

Posted in MIDDLE-EAST POLITICS with tags , , , , on October 11, 2016 by drjgelb

03fd4bc95eac3f340b925c66ddbba1635f912b1dd5499be30b2f610b97c10f84Islam\’s Bitch

Source: Bosch Fawstin:Cartoons

%d bloggers like this: